Neuroscientific aspects of mathematics learning

exploring the innate cognitive structures of the brain

Authors

  • Thiago da Silva Gusmão Cardoso Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Mauro Muszkat Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Keywords:

Mathematics, Learning, Neurosciences, Number Sense, Cognition

Abstract

Many studies have been conducted about how the brain deals with mathematical information. These researches have agreed with the assertion that we have a brain module for processing of numbers and quantities, in the literature referred to as number sense. The expansion of this module, however, depends on how much mathematical knowledge is acquired and the culture we live through learning. Thus, this article aims to discuss aspects related to mathematical learning from the perspective of neuroscience, highlighting research findings related to this issue, as the models postulated to explain the relationship between the brain and numerical processing, namely Approximate Number System (ANS) and the Triple Code Model (TCM).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Thiago da Silva Gusmão Cardoso, Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Doutor em Educação e Saúde pela Unifesp. Programa de Pós­graduação em Educação e Saúde da Unifesp. Centro Universitário Adventista de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP.

Mauro Muszkat, Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Doutor em Neurologia pela Unifesp. Departamento de Psicobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP.

References

Geary DC. An evolutionary perspective on learning disability in mathematics. Dev Neuropsychol. 2007;32(1):471-519.

Starkey P, Cooper RG Jr. Perception of numbers by human infants. Science. 1980;210(4473):1033-5.

Bijeljac-Babic R, Bertoncini J, Mehler J. How do 4-day-old infants categorize multisyllabic utterances? Dev Psychol. 1993;29(4):711-21.

Green D. Os diferentes termos numéricos das línguas indígenas do Brasil. In: Ferreira MKL, org. Ideias matemáticas de povos culturalmente distintos. São Paulo: Global; 2002.

Previtali P, Rinaldi L, Girelli L. Nature or nurture in finger counting: a review on the determinants of the direction of number-finger mapping. Front Psychol. 2011;2:363.

Sato M, Cattaneo L, Rizzolatti G, Gallese V. Numbers within our hands: modulation of corticospinal excitability of hand muscles during numerical judgment. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007;19(4):684-93.

Crollen V, Mahe R, Colligon O, Seron X. The role of vision in the development of finger-number interactions: finger-counting and finger-montring in blind children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2011;109(4):525-39.

Kaufmann L, Vogel SE, Wood G, Kremser C, Schocke M, Zimmerhackl LB, et al. A developmental fMRI study of nonsymbolic numerical and spatial processing. Cortex. 2008;44(4):376-85.

Pulvermüller F. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Rev Neurosci. 2005;6(7):576-82.

Odic D, Libertus ME, Feigenson L, Halberda J. Developmental change in the acuity of approximate number and area representations. Dev Psychol. 2013;49(6):1103-12.

von Aster MG, Shalev RS. Number development and developmental dyscalculia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(11):868-73.

Dehaene S. The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.

Mazzocco MM, Devlin KT, McKenney SJ. Is it a fact? Timed arithmetic performance of children with mathematical learning disabilities (MLD) varies as a function of how MLD is defined. Dev Neuropsychol. 2008;33(3):318-44.

Cantlon JF, Platt ML, Brannon EM. Beyond the number domain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009;13(2):83-91.

Walsh V. A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;7(11):483-8.

Cohen-Kadosh R, Henik A, Rubinsten O, Mohr H, Dori H, van der Ven V, et al. Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(9):1238-48.

Leibovich T, Diesendruck L, Rubinsten O, Henik A. The importance of being relevant: modulation of magnitude representations. Front Psychol. 2013;4:369.

Piazza M. Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010;14(12):542-51.

Nys J, Ventura P, Fernandes T, Querido L, Leybaert J, Content A. Does math education modify the approximate number system? A comparison of schooled and unschooled adults. Trends Neurosci Educ. 2013;2(1):13-22.

Cantlon JF. Math, monkeys, and the developing brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109 Suppl 1:10725-32.

Dehaene S, Piazza M, Pinel P, Cohen L. Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003;20(3):487-506.

McCloskey M. Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: evidence from acquired dyscalculia. Cognition. 1992;44(1-2):107-57.

Thevenot C, Castel C, Danjon J, Fanget M, Fayol M. The use of the operand-recognition paradigm for the study of mental addition in older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013;68(1):64-7.

Klein E, Moeller K, Glauche V, Weiller C, Willmes K. Processing pathways in mental arithmetic–evidence from probabilistic fiber tracking. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55455.

Dehaene S, Cohen L, Sigman M, Vinckier F. The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9(7):335-41.

Published

2018-04-01

How to Cite

Cardoso, T. da S. G., & Muszkat, M. (2018). Neuroscientific aspects of mathematics learning: exploring the innate cognitive structures of the brain. Psychopedagogy Journal, 35(106), 73–81. Retrieved from https://revistapsicopedagogia.com.br/revista/article/view/332

Issue

Section

Review Article